Debate mapper/icons - Revision history

Woozle: updated introduction

2013-03-04T12:55:48Z

updated introduction

Woozle: Woozle moved page Issuepedia/Debaticons to Debate mapper/icons without leaving a redirect: because reasons

2013-03-04T12:49:36Z

Woozle moved page Issuepedia/Debaticons to Debate mapper/icons without leaving a redirect: because reasons

Woozle: 8 revisions: pages with namespace issues (fixed, I hope)

2013-01-18T13:58:04Z

8 revisions: pages with namespace issues (fixed, I hope)

Woozle: argumenticon -> debaticon; general updating; list of existing icons

2009-08-18T19:08:20Z

argumenticon -> debaticon; general updating; list of existing icons

Woozle: moved Issuepedia:Argumenticons to Issuepedia:Debaticons: shorter, refers implicitly to "structured debate"

2009-08-18T14:42:32Z

moved Issuepedia:Argumenticons to Issuepedia:Debaticons: shorter, refers implicitly to "structured debate"

Woozle: reverted to latest version after data restore

2009-04-28T20:25:05Z

reverted to latest version after data restore

Woozle: removed non-template example; removed fancy image-links from Rules and just made them standard images; added note about new quote icons

2009-03-29T17:58:14Z

removed non-template example; removed fancy image-links from Rules and just made them standard images; added note about new quote icons

Woozle: /* Example */ templates and rules

2007-09-12T22:11:21Z

Example: templates and rules

Woozle: example with all 3 icons

2007-09-12T21:48:04Z

example with all 3 icons

Woozle: /* Related Pages */ fixed the category link

2007-09-12T20:55:08Z

Related Pages: fixed the category link

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Introduction==
-[[category:debaticons]][[Issuepedia:Debaticons|Debaticons]] are like [[wikipedia:emoticons|emoticons]] for showing the [[structured debate|structure of an argument or discussion]]. In much the same way a "smiley" or "frowny" emoticon is a graphical shorthand to indicate happiness or unhappiness with a statement, debaticons are graphical shorthands to indicate a given statement's position with respect to the overall debate.
+The following icons are intended as a visual aid to indicate the significance of each line in a [[structured debate]]; they work best when invoked via templates (as shown in the examples below) which also add shading to the background of the text whose status is being indicated.
 ==Icons==
 ===key icons===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Introduction==
-[[category:argumenticons]][[Issuepedia:Argumenticons|Argumenticons]] are kind of like [[wikipedia:emoticons|emoticons]] for showing the structure of an argument or discussion.{{seedling}}
+[[category:debaticons]][[Issuepedia:Debaticons|Debaticons]] are like [[wikipedia:emoticons|emoticons]] for showing the [[structured debate|structure of an argument or discussion]]. In much the same way a "smiley" or "frowny" emoticon is a graphical shorthand to indicate happiness or unhappiness with a statement, debaticons are graphical shorthands to indicate a given statement's position with respect to the overall debate.
 ==Related Pages==
-* the [[:category:argumenticons|argumenticons]] category is where we will keep all our argumenticon images and templates
+* the [[:category:debaticons|debaticons]] category is where we will keep all our debaticon images and templates
+==Examples==
 :{{arg/main|Stuff exists!}}
 ::{{arg/support|Indeed, surveys show that nothing could be more true!}}
@@ Line 10: / Line 25: @@
 :::{{arg/support|Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!}}
-I'm going to leave all the support/counter icons the same size for now, at least until it becomes clear that we have a use for the other sizes.
+: {{arg/main|Stuff made by Big Phatt Lyar Industries is better than the stuff made by Quality Products, Inc.}}
+:: {{arg/support|A spokesman for Bigg Phatt Lyar Industries said:}} {{arg/quote|Our products are absolutely the finest quality of any products anywhere, so there is no need for people to go criticizing them. Criticism hampers quality control, which only harms the consumer.}}
-'''To be documented''': How to use the quote icons - text as originally spoken or written (either by an arguer or by a 3rd party), which may need to be broken down into sub-claims:
+::: {{arg/counter|A company spokesman would probably say that whether or not it was true.}}
 ===Rules===
 Points are '''supporting''' ([[File:Arrow-button-up-25px.png|15px]]) if they support the current '''main point''' ([[File:Arrow-button-rt-25px.png|15px]]). If a point supports the current '''counterpoint''' ([[File:Arrow-button-dn-15px.png]]), then it is also a counterpoint. If it argues ''against'' the current '''counterpoint''', then it is a '''supporting point'''. (This way you don't have to go up through the levels counting in order to figure out which "side" a point is on.)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ==Example==
-For practical use, we'll have templates... but here is an example of the general idea, for now:
+:{{arg/main|Stuff exists!}}
-:<linkedimage>
+::{{arg/support|Indeed, surveys show that nothing could be more true!}}
-wikipage=Issuepedia:Argumenticons
+::{{arg/counter|That is an utter load of foetid dingo's kidneys!}}
-tooltip=newpoint
+:::{{arg/support|Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!}}
-The same thing, with templates:
+I'm going to leave all the support/counter icons the same size for now, at least until it becomes clear that we have a use for the other sizes.
-I'm going to leave all the support/counter icons the same size for now, at least until it becomes clear that we have a use for the other sizes.
+'''To be documented''': How to use the quote icons - text as originally spoken or written (either by an arguer or by a 3rd party), which may need to be broken down into sub-claims:
 ===Rules===
-Points are '''supporting''' (<linkedimage>
+Points are '''supporting''' ([[File:Arrow-button-up-25px.png|15px]]) if they support the current '''main point''' ([[File:Arrow-button-rt-25px.png|15px]]). If a point supports the current '''counterpoint''' ([[File:Arrow-button-dn-15px.png]]), then it is also a counterpoint. If it argues ''against'' the current '''counterpoint''', then it is a '''supporting point'''. (This way you don't have to go up through the levels counting in order to figure out which "side" a point is on.)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 12 September 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	img_alt=up arrow argumenticon		img_alt=up arrow argumenticon
	</linkedimage> Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!		</linkedimage> Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!
		+
		+	The same thing, with templates:
		+	:{{arg.newpoint\|Stuff exists!}}
		+	::{{arg.supportpoint\|Indeed, surveys show that nothing could be more true!}}
		+	::{{arg.counterpoint\|That is an utter load of foetid dingo's kidneys!}}
		+	:::{{arg.supportpoint\|Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!}}
		+
		+	I'm going to leave all the support/counter icons the same size for now, at least until it becomes clear that we have a use for the other sizes.
		+	===Rules===
		+	Points are '''supporting''' (<linkedimage>
		+	wikipage=Issuepedia:Argumenticons
		+	tooltip=minor supportpoint
		+	img_src=Image:Arrow-button-up-15px.png
		+	img_alt=up arrow argumenticon
		+	</linkedimage>) if they support the current '''new point''' (<linkedimage>
		+	wikipage=Issuepedia:Argumenticons
		+	tooltip=newpoint
		+	img_src=Image:Arrow-button-rt-15px.png
		+	img_alt=right arrow argumenticon
		+	</linkedimage>). If a point supports the current '''counterpoint''' (<linkedimage>
		+	wikipage=Issuepedia:Argumenticons
		+	tooltip=counterpoint
		+	img_src=Image:Arrow-button-dn-15px.png
		+	img_alt=down arrow argumenticon
		+	</linkedimage>), then it is also a counterpoint. If it argues ''against'' the current '''counterpoint''', then it is a '''supporting point'''.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Introduction==
-[[Issuepedia:Argumenticons|Argumenticons]] are kind of like [[wikipedia:emoticons|emoticons]] for showing the structure of an argument or discussion.{{seedling}}
+[[category:argumenticons]][[Issuepedia:Argumenticons|Argumenticons]] are kind of like [[wikipedia:emoticons|emoticons]] for showing the structure of an argument or discussion.{{seedling}}
 ==Related Pages==
 * the [[:category:argumenticons|argumenticons]] category is where we will keep all our argumenticon images and templates
 ==Example==
 :<linkedimage>
-wikipage=Main_Page
+wikipage=Issuepedia:Argumenticons
-tooltip=counterpoint
+tooltip=newpoint
-img_src=Image:Arrow-button-up-25px.png
+img_src=Image:Arrow-button-rt-25px.png
 img_alt=up arrow argumenticon
-</linkedimage> Yes, nothing could be more true!
+</linkedimage> Indeed, nothing could be more true!
-:<linkedimage>
+::<linkedimage>
-wikipage=Main_Page
+wikipage=Issuepedia:Argumenticons
 tooltip=counterpoint
-img_src=Image:Arrow-button-dn-25px.png
+img_src=Image:Arrow-button-dn-20px.png
 img_alt=down arrow argumenticon
 </linkedimage> That is an utter load of foetid dingo's kidneys!

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:49, 4 March 2013
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:58, 18 January 2013
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:42, 18 August 2009
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:25, 28 April 2009
(No difference)