Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement - Revision history

Woozle: layout tweaks

2021-05-03T12:25:55Z

layout tweaks

2017-10-24T13:13:53Z

deleted Periscope page -- content moved to Mechanisms

2017-03-02T21:14:06Z

tweaks

2017-01-21T01:55:08Z

post-move adjustments

2017-01-21T01:51:48Z

2016-06-11T17:07:55Z

brief intro; sea-lioning

2016-06-11T16:54:59Z

Woozle moved page Friend-based online community policing to Friend-based policing: in the context of this site, should be shorter

2016-06-11T16:52:29Z

2016-06-11T16:46:56Z

Periscope

2016-04-14T13:51:34Z

Notes: online harassment

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==About==
 [[Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement]] is a methodology for sharply reducing the problem of posting content in bad faith (including both outright verbal abuse as well as abuses that are harder to spot, such as {{l/ip|sea-lioning}}) by allowing users to collectively delegate other trusted users to rate comments and commenters as to their credibility and appropriateness. It generally increases per-user accountability for abuse, but with the source of that accountability being other users rather than a central authority (with all the bottlenecking and [[power-concentration]] that implies).
+==Pages==
-Pages:
+<big>
-* [[/purpose]] - this needs to be a bit more general
+* '''{{l/sub|purpose}}''' - this needs to be a bit more general
-* [[/mechanism]] - the quasi-technical details
+* '''{{l/sub|mechanism}}''' - the quasi-technical details
 ==Notes==
 Things that credibility management ''should'' be able to defeat or at least control:

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 * [[/purpose]] - this needs to be a bit more general
 * [[/mechanism]] - the quasi-technical details
 ==Notes==
 Things that credibility management ''should'' be able to defeat or at least control:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==About==
-[[Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement]] is a methodology for sharply reducing the problem of posting content in bad faith (including both outright verbal abuse as well as abuses that are harder to spot, such as sea-lioning) by allowing users to collectively delegate other trusted users to rate comments and commenters as to their credibility and appropriateness. It generally increases per-user accountability for abuse, but with the source of that accountability being other users rather than a central authority (with all the bottlenecking that implies).
+[[Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement]] is a methodology for sharply reducing the problem of posting content in bad faith (including both outright verbal abuse as well as abuses that are harder to spot, such as {{l/ip|sea-lioning}}) by allowing users to collectively delegate other trusted users to rate comments and commenters as to their credibility and appropriateness. It generally increases per-user accountability for abuse, but with the source of that accountability being other users rather than a central authority (with all the bottlenecking and [[power-concentration]] that implies).
 Pages:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==About==
-[[Friend-based policing]], short for friend-based online community policing, is a methodology for sharply reducing the problem of bad-faith commenting (including both outright verbal abuse as well as abuses that are harder to spot, such as sea-lioning) by allowing users to collectively delegate other trusted users to rate comments and commenters as to their credibility and appropriateness. It generally increases per-user accountability for abuse, but with the source of that accountability being other users rather than a central authority (with all the bottlenecking that implies).
+[[Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement]] is a methodology for sharply reducing the problem of posting content in bad faith (including both outright verbal abuse as well as abuses that are harder to spot, such as sea-lioning) by allowing users to collectively delegate other trusted users to rate comments and commenters as to their credibility and appropriateness. It generally increases per-user accountability for abuse, but with the source of that accountability being other users rather than a central authority (with all the bottlenecking that implies).
 Pages:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Contents==
+==About==
 * [[/purpose]] - this needs to be a bit more general
 * [[/mechanism]] - the quasi-technical details
@@ Line 6: / Line 9: @@
 ==Notes==
 Things that credibility management ''should'' be able to defeat or at least control:
 * [[brigading]] -- though it may take a combination of credibility management and [[debate mapping]]:
 ** '''2015-07-17''' [http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/07/17/there-are-good-reasons-ive-never-been-a-fan-of-reddit/ There are good reasons I’ve never been a fan of Reddit]

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:51, 21 January 2017
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:54, 11 June 2016
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:52, 11 June 2016
(No difference)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 ** '''2015-04-20''' [http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121551/bot-bubble-click-farms-have-inflated-social-media-currency How Click Farms Have Inflated Social Media Currency]
 *** private discussion [https://plus.google.com/u/0/104092656004159577193/posts/MGmWGw3vUBx here]
 Credibility management is beginning to look potentially useful for rating subjective quality of aesthetic works. Some discussion of that application is here: