Difference between revisions of "Liquid agenda"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(links to other sites with info about the project) |
(relevant idea) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* rate each proposed solution on a semicontinuous scale which allows both negative and positive indications (i.e. [[range voting]]) | * rate each proposed solution on a semicontinuous scale which allows both negative and positive indications (i.e. [[range voting]]) | ||
** the vote would ideally be handled by something like [[weighted proxy voting]] | ** the vote would ideally be handled by something like [[weighted proxy voting]] | ||
| − | + | ** there would need to be some kind of [[credibility management]] to minimize trolling and vote spamming | |
The individual ratings can then be summed up and acted upon according to whatever algorithm or process has been previously deemed appropriate by the votership. | The individual ratings can then be summed up and acted upon according to whatever algorithm or process has been previously deemed appropriate by the votership. | ||
There is a more technical discussion [[htyp:InstaGov/Liquid Agenda|on HTYP]]. | There is a more technical discussion [[htyp:InstaGov/Liquid Agenda|on HTYP]]. | ||
==Purpose== | ==Purpose== | ||
| − | The purpose of this system is to prevent any individual group from controlling the agenda, | + | The purpose of this system is to prevent any individual group from controlling the agenda, thereby limiting the possible outcomes only to those they find acceptable and thus effectively controlling the decisionmaking process while continuing to provide the appearance of choice. |
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
| + | ===Official=== | ||
* [http://htyp.org/InstaGov/Liquid_Agenda technical documentation] | * [http://htyp.org/InstaGov/Liquid_Agenda technical documentation] | ||
* [http://bugs.hypertwins.org/projects/liquid-agenda project manager] | * [http://bugs.hypertwins.org/projects/liquid-agenda project manager] | ||
| + | ===Relevant=== | ||
| + | * '''2010-10-24''' [http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/social-software-sunday-4-the-kickstarter-social-mechanism/ Social Software Sunday #4 – The “Kickstarter” social mechanism]: a similar idea (with a variation and a generalization) is proposed | ||
Revision as of 18:45, 2 June 2015
About
A liquid agenda system is a system which allows any participant to:
- propose issues or problems to be solved (referred to here as "questions")
- propose any number of solutions or preferred outcomes for each question (referred to here as "answers")
- rate each proposed solution on a semicontinuous scale which allows both negative and positive indications (i.e. range voting)
- the vote would ideally be handled by something like weighted proxy voting
- there would need to be some kind of credibility management to minimize trolling and vote spamming
The individual ratings can then be summed up and acted upon according to whatever algorithm or process has been previously deemed appropriate by the votership.
There is a more technical discussion on HTYP.
Purpose
The purpose of this system is to prevent any individual group from controlling the agenda, thereby limiting the possible outcomes only to those they find acceptable and thus effectively controlling the decisionmaking process while continuing to provide the appearance of choice.
Links
Official
Relevant
- 2010-10-24 Social Software Sunday #4 – The “Kickstarter” social mechanism: a similar idea (with a variation and a generalization) is proposed