Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
("inquest" is more "methodology" than "application") |
(→Presentation: Removed useless "Roadmap" page) |
||
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<big>'''InstaGov''' is a set of tools for instant self-governance via computer network. It is currently under development. It will be open-source and distributed/federated.</big> | <big>'''InstaGov''' is a set of tools for instant self-governance via computer network. It is currently under development. It will be open-source and distributed/federated.</big> | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
− | {| | + | {| width=100% |
|- | |- | ||
| valign=top | | | valign=top | | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* to watch for exploit holes and "gaming" of these implementations, and work out ways to defeat these while they are still small | * to watch for exploit holes and "gaming" of these implementations, and work out ways to defeat these while they are still small | ||
* to eventually make traditional government both unnecessary and irrelevant | * to eventually make traditional government both unnecessary and irrelevant | ||
+ | In order to work towards these goals, it is necessary to better understand the [[mechanics of power]]. | ||
| valign=top | | | valign=top | | ||
==External Pages== | ==External Pages== | ||
Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
* Google+: <echo raw now><a href="https://plus.google.com/111304337631160193138" rel="publisher" class="external text">page</a></echo> and [https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/117423839385292311095 community] | * Google+: <echo raw now><a href="https://plus.google.com/111304337631160193138" rel="publisher" class="external text">page</a></echo> and [https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/117423839385292311095 community] | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | {| | + | {| width=100% |
|- | |- | ||
| valign=top | | | valign=top | | ||
Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
* [[liquid agenda]] | * [[liquid agenda]] | ||
* [[debate mapper]] | * [[debate mapper]] | ||
− | * [[ | + | * [[P2P Accountability Enforcement]] |
* [[categorization]] | * [[categorization]] | ||
* [[proxy voting]] | * [[proxy voting]] | ||
+ | ** [[weighted proxy voting|weighted]] | ||
| valign=top | | | valign=top | | ||
+ | |||
==Methodology== | ==Methodology== | ||
+ | * [[cooperatives]] | ||
* [[governance methods]]: alternatives | * [[governance methods]]: alternatives | ||
* [[inquest]] | * [[inquest]] | ||
* [[liquid democracy]] | * [[liquid democracy]] | ||
+ | * [[liquid representation]] | ||
* [[rational debate]] | * [[rational debate]] | ||
* [[stages of change]] | * [[stages of change]] | ||
| valign=top | | | valign=top | | ||
+ | |||
==Applications== | ==Applications== | ||
* [[democratic militia]] | * [[democratic militia]] | ||
Line 39: | Line 45: | ||
* solutions to the [[taxation problem]]: | * solutions to the [[taxation problem]]: | ||
** [[co-operatization of large companies]] | ** [[co-operatization of large companies]] | ||
− | |||
** [[opt-in market socialism]] | ** [[opt-in market socialism]] | ||
** [[socialized land ownership]] | ** [[socialized land ownership]] | ||
+ | | valign=top | | ||
+ | ==Presentation== | ||
+ | * [[Collaborative network]] | ||
+ | * [[Circling the wagons]] | ||
+ | * [[International Citizens' Union]] | ||
+ | * [[Premises]] | ||
+ | * [[Structural overview]] | ||
+ | * [[Social business coalition]] | ||
+ | * [[Solutions]] | ||
+ | * [[US House of Commons]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
==Related Projects== | ==Related Projects== | ||
+ | * [http://democracyos.org/ DemocracyOS]: liquid democracy implementation ([https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2017/06/12/case-against-bill-gates-mark-zuckerberg-and-philanthropy-we-know-it via] [https://social.coop/users/ntnsndr/updates/4088 via author on Mastodon]): code is on GitHub | ||
+ | * Liquid Agenda and the Debate Mapper could probably benefit from having a UI like [https://github.com/Agora-Project/agora-meteor this], at least as an option. ([https://witches.town/@Angle author on Mastodon]) | ||
+ | * '''[http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-humanity-online-project The Humanity Online Project]''' | ||
+ | * '''[https://love.loomio.org/real-democracy-needs-to-include-everyone Loomio]''' | ||
+ | ** [https://loomio.coop/ software co-op] | ||
* '''[[Liquid Feedback]]''' (a project of the Pirate Party) | * '''[[Liquid Feedback]]''' (a project of the Pirate Party) | ||
* '''Make Your Laws''': [http://makeyourlaws.org main site] .. [http://wiki.makeyourlaws.org wiki] .. [https://plus.google.com/100183759660923071401/about Google+] | * '''Make Your Laws''': [http://makeyourlaws.org main site] .. [http://wiki.makeyourlaws.org wiki] .. [https://plus.google.com/100183759660923071401/about Google+] | ||
===proprietary / centralized=== | ===proprietary / centralized=== | ||
* [http://www.deliberator.com/ Deliberator]: very similar to [[htyp:InstaGov/Liquid Agenda|Liquid Agenda]], but more heavily moderated and produced | * [http://www.deliberator.com/ Deliberator]: very similar to [[htyp:InstaGov/Liquid Agenda|Liquid Agenda]], but more heavily moderated and produced | ||
+ | * [https://blog.kialo.com/kialo-hello-world-d12ac78a320a Kialo]: similar to [[debate mapper]] | ||
+ | * [https://www.loomio.org/ Loomio]: "a user-friendly tool for group decision-making. Creating a world where it’s easy for anyone to participate in decisions that affect them." Subscription is pay-what-you-like; looks like interaction may be limited to "groups". | ||
* [http://participedia.net/en Participedia] "open global knowledge community for researchers and practitioners in the field of democratic innovation and public engagement." | * [http://participedia.net/en Participedia] "open global knowledge community for researchers and practitioners in the field of democratic innovation and public engagement." | ||
* [https://www.popvox.com/ PopVox] ([https://plus.google.com/115845584660035325057 Google+]): tell US Congress your opinion of bills | * [https://www.popvox.com/ PopVox] ([https://plus.google.com/115845584660035325057 Google+]): tell US Congress your opinion of bills | ||
* [http://participedia.net/en/organizations/wikivote WikiVote] "Russian non-governmental organization which goal is to develop effective means of citizens’ participation in lawmaking and strategic planning" | * [http://participedia.net/en/organizations/wikivote WikiVote] "Russian non-governmental organization which goal is to develop effective means of citizens’ participation in lawmaking and strategic planning" | ||
+ | * [http://thespark.org/ The Spark] "Users post and vote on PROBLEMS that we face as a global community. The most popular problems are voted to the top. Users then post and vote on SOLUTIONS so that the community can take ACTION." - sounds similar to [[liquid agenda]] | ||
===techniques=== | ===techniques=== | ||
+ | * [[wikipedia:Participatory politics]]: hierarchical representation carried out more thoroughly | ||
+ | ** [http://web.archive.org/web/20140327013949/http://rebooting.personaldemocracy.com/node/5490 Professional Politicians Beware!] by Aaron Swartz ([http://50.81.205.197/photo_album/chron/2017/2017_02_21-book_review-the_boy_who_could_change_the_world-the_writings_of_aaron_swartz/politics.html via]) | ||
* [[wikipedia:Rational consensus]]: the method is not currently described in the article, but perhaps the article will be expanded soon. A user has described this system thusly: "ideas are based on known facts and good practices." | * [[wikipedia:Rational consensus]]: the method is not currently described in the article, but perhaps the article will be expanded soon. A user has described this system thusly: "ideas are based on known facts and good practices." | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===discussion=== | ||
+ | * [http://online-governance.quora.com/ Quora] | ||
+ | ===plans=== | ||
+ | * [https://sites.google.com/site/equalityincorporated/ Equality Incorporated] ([https://plus.google.com/u/0/112240283217111217636/posts/DKe7hDFuq38 discussion]) | ||
+ | * [http://www.wolf-pac.com/the_plan Wolf PAC] | ||
+ | * '''2013-07-31''' [http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/how-democrats-can-reclaim-north-carolina-government/Content?oid=3685711 How Democrats can reclaim North Carolina government] |
Revision as of 10:02, 21 March 2018
InstaGov is a set of tools for instant self-governance via computer network. It is currently under development. It will be open-source and distributed/federated.
Goals
In order to work towards these goals, it is necessary to better understand the mechanics of power. |
External Pages
|
Modules |
Methodology |
Applications
|
Presentation |
Related Projects
- DemocracyOS: liquid democracy implementation (via via author on Mastodon): code is on GitHub
- Liquid Agenda and the Debate Mapper could probably benefit from having a UI like this, at least as an option. (author on Mastodon)
- The Humanity Online Project
- Loomio
- Liquid Feedback (a project of the Pirate Party)
- Make Your Laws: main site .. wiki .. Google+
proprietary / centralized
- Deliberator: very similar to Liquid Agenda, but more heavily moderated and produced
- Kialo: similar to debate mapper
- Loomio: "a user-friendly tool for group decision-making. Creating a world where it’s easy for anyone to participate in decisions that affect them." Subscription is pay-what-you-like; looks like interaction may be limited to "groups".
- Participedia "open global knowledge community for researchers and practitioners in the field of democratic innovation and public engagement."
- PopVox (Google+): tell US Congress your opinion of bills
- WikiVote "Russian non-governmental organization which goal is to develop effective means of citizens’ participation in lawmaking and strategic planning"
- The Spark "Users post and vote on PROBLEMS that we face as a global community. The most popular problems are voted to the top. Users then post and vote on SOLUTIONS so that the community can take ACTION." - sounds similar to liquid agenda
techniques
- wikipedia:Participatory politics: hierarchical representation carried out more thoroughly
- Professional Politicians Beware! by Aaron Swartz (via)
- wikipedia:Rational consensus: the method is not currently described in the article, but perhaps the article will be expanded soon. A user has described this system thusly: "ideas are based on known facts and good practices."