Representative democracy

From InstaGov
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

About

Representative democracy (RD) is a system of government in which citizens elect representatives to make policy decisions – as opposed to direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on such decisions.

  • Advantages:
    • Decisionmakers can be provided with adequate resources (time, assistance, expertise) for making good decisions.
    • Meaningful debate and consensus are theoretically possible, given the smaller number of negotiators.
  • Disadvantages:
    • RD creates unaccountable concentration of power in a number of ways:
      • Traditional forms of RD usually have set terms for each representative and a very high bar for recall (i.e. removal from office by popular initiative), giving them a large window during which they may do damage.
      • Traditional electoral methods:
        • support the creation and continuance of a two-party system, greatly narrowing the field of available candidates.
        • do not represent the wishes of the voters very accurately, often resulting in the election of "compromise" candidates strongly disliked by a majority.
        • can be manipulated by the powerful in a number of ways, including gerrymandering and mass-media propaganda (advertising).

Solutions

  • Liquid representation attempts to address the problems inherent in RD without creating the problems inherent in DD.
  • Range voting increases vote fidelity, making it more difficult to manipulate the vote and providing less stability for a two-party system.
  • Having representatives deliberate online, so that they didn't need to travel long distances when elected, would reduce the need for long terms of office.
    • Having such deliberations take place solely in text mode would also provide a searchable record of such deliberation, making it easier to hold representatives accountable.
    • Structured debate would rigorously document the logic (if any) behind each position, further ensuring accountability.

Links