Difference between revisions of "Stages of change"
(shorter list; moved old list to subpage) |
(resources, approval, and action are all part of "implementation") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
# '''logistics''': there is a plan which could accomplish the goal(s), if implemented | # '''logistics''': there is a plan which could accomplish the goal(s), if implemented | ||
| − | # '''resources''': the necessary resources (e.g. political support) are available | + | # '''implementation''': |
| − | # '''approval''': the necessary resources are approved by their gatekeepers (e.g. Congress passes a bill) | + | #* '''resources''': the necessary resources (e.g. political support) are available |
| − | # '''action''': the plan is set in motion (e.g. funds go to appropriate organizations) | + | #* '''approval''': the necessary resources are approved by their gatekeepers (e.g. Congress passes a bill) |
| + | #* '''action''': the plan is set in motion (e.g. funds go to appropriate organizations) | ||
# '''survival''': the plan survives attempts to subvert or reverse it | # '''survival''': the plan survives attempts to subvert or reverse it | ||
Revision as of 18:32, 20 May 2015
About
Any desired social or political change must go through several stages before becoming the new status quo. These stages are often lumped together under the heading "how", but the answer to the question "how can we do this" is substantially different depending on which stage(s) one is asking about.
- logistics: there is a plan which could accomplish the goal(s), if implemented
- implementation:
- resources: the necessary resources (e.g. political support) are available
- approval: the necessary resources are approved by their gatekeepers (e.g. Congress passes a bill)
- action: the plan is set in motion (e.g. funds go to appropriate organizations)
- survival: the plan survives attempts to subvert or reverse it
(An earlier, longer version of this list is here.)
Fallacies
Much confusion arises from failure to distinguish between these phases. Proposals intended to address one phase are often criticized for their failure to address another, without any acknowledgement that these are different problems. Logistical stage proposals, for example, will often be criticized for lack of provisioning.
Proposals involving allocation of resources are particularly subject to this kind of conflation. For example, a proposal regarding how resources should be distributed (conception or logistics stage) will be criticized for wanting to "take" or "steal" resources from their current owners -- when in fact the proposal says nothing about the mechanisms whereby such redistribution might take place (provisioning). The provisioning stage might be, for example:
- creating a microsociety in which the proposed rules would be applied and therefore involving only voluntary redistribution
- changing the incentive structure of the existing economy so as to encourage voluntary redistribution along the lines proposed
Links
Discussion
- 2013-03-27 Google+: open proposal of this breakdown