Representative democracy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
About
Representative democracy (RD) is a system of government in which citizens elect representatives to make policy decisions – as opposed to direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on such decisions.
- Advantages:
- Decisionmakers can be provided with adequate resources (time, assistance, expertise) for making good decisions.
- Meaningful debate and consensus are theoretically possible, given the smaller number of negotiators.
- Disadvantages:
- RD creates unaccountable concentration of power in a number of ways:
- Traditional forms of RD usually have set terms for each representative and a very high bar for recall (i.e. removal from office by popular initiative), giving them a large window during which they may do damage.
- Traditional electoral methods:
- support the creation and continuance of a two-party system, greatly narrowing the field of available candidates.
- do not represent the wishes of the voters very accurately, often resulting in the election of "compromise" candidates strongly disliked by a majority.
- can be manipulated by the powerful in a number of ways, including gerrymandering and mass-media propaganda (advertising).
- RD creates unaccountable concentration of power in a number of ways:
Solutions
- Liquid representation attempts to address the problems inherent in RD without creating the problems inherent in DD.
- Range voting increases vote fidelity, making it more difficult to manipulate the vote and providing less stability for a two-party system.
- Having representatives deliberate online, so that they didn't need to travel long distances when elected, would reduce the need for long terms of office.
- Having such deliberations take place solely in text mode would also provide a searchable record of such deliberation, making it easier to hold representatives accountable.
- Structured debate would rigorously document the logic (if any) behind each position, further ensuring accountability.