Difference between revisions of "Debate mapper/icons"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(removed non-template example; removed fancy image-links from Rules and just made them standard images; added note about new quote icons) |
(updated introduction) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[category:debate mapping]] | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
| − | [[ | + | The following icons are intended as a visual aid to indicate the significance of each line in a [[structured debate]]; they work best when invoked via templates (as shown in the examples below) which also add shading to the background of the text whose status is being indicated. |
| + | ==Icons== | ||
| + | ===key icons=== | ||
| + | : [[File:Arrow-button-rt-25px.png|15px]] '''Main point / claim''' | ||
| + | : [[File:Arrow-button-up-25px.png|15px]] '''Supporting point''' | ||
| + | : [[File:Arrow-button-dn-25px.png|15px]] '''Counterpoint''' | ||
| + | : [[File:Arrow-button-i-20px.png|15px]] '''Information''' stipulated by both sides, or from an agreed-on authority | ||
| + | ===auxiliary=== | ||
| + | It's less certain how useful these will be; possibly handy for experimentation. | ||
| + | : [[File:Button-quote.png]][[File:Button-unquote.png]] quote open/close; see [[Template:Arg/quote]] | ||
| + | : [[File:Button-check-20px.png|15px]] possibly statements posted by one side and agreed by the other (where the "I" debaticon indicates items agreed to ''before''hand) | ||
| + | :* "X" icons, generally intended to indicate some clear error or misuse (e.g. a [[logical fallacy]] or factual error): | ||
| + | :: [[File:Button-green-X.20px.png|15px]] discovery of error supports main claim; see [[Template:Arg/support/fact]] | ||
| + | :: [[File:Button-red-X.20px.png|15px]] discovery of error weakens main claim; see [[Template:Arg/counter/fact]] | ||
| + | : [[File:Button-e!-20px.png|15px]] '''Error''': early, less-clear version of red X icon | ||
==Related Pages== | ==Related Pages== | ||
| − | * the [[:category: | + | * the [[:category:debaticons|debaticons]] category is where we will keep all our debaticon images and templates |
| − | + | ==Examples== | |
| − | == | ||
:{{arg/main|Stuff exists!}} | :{{arg/main|Stuff exists!}} | ||
::{{arg/support|Indeed, surveys show that nothing could be more true!}} | ::{{arg/support|Indeed, surveys show that nothing could be more true!}} | ||
| Line 10: | Line 24: | ||
:::{{arg/support|Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!}} | :::{{arg/support|Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!}} | ||
| − | + | : {{arg/main|Stuff made by Big Phatt Lyar Industries is better than the stuff made by Quality Products, Inc.}} | |
| − | + | :: {{arg/support|A spokesman for Bigg Phatt Lyar Industries said:}} {{arg/quote|Our products are absolutely the finest quality of any products anywhere, so there is no need for people to go criticizing them. Criticism hampers quality control, which only harms the consumer.}} | |
| − | + | ::: {{arg/counter|A company spokesman would probably say that whether or not it was true.}} | |
| − | : {{arg/support|A spokesman for Bigg Phatt Lyar Industries said:}} {{arg/quote|Our products are absolutely the finest quality of any products anywhere, so there is no need for people to go criticizing them. Criticism hampers quality control, which only harms the consumer.}} | ||
===Rules=== | ===Rules=== | ||
Points are '''supporting''' ([[File:Arrow-button-up-25px.png|15px]]) if they support the current '''main point''' ([[File:Arrow-button-rt-25px.png|15px]]). If a point supports the current '''counterpoint''' ([[File:Arrow-button-dn-15px.png]]), then it is also a counterpoint. If it argues ''against'' the current '''counterpoint''', then it is a '''supporting point'''. (This way you don't have to go up through the levels counting in order to figure out which "side" a point is on.) | Points are '''supporting''' ([[File:Arrow-button-up-25px.png|15px]]) if they support the current '''main point''' ([[File:Arrow-button-rt-25px.png|15px]]). If a point supports the current '''counterpoint''' ([[File:Arrow-button-dn-15px.png]]), then it is also a counterpoint. If it argues ''against'' the current '''counterpoint''', then it is a '''supporting point'''. (This way you don't have to go up through the levels counting in order to figure out which "side" a point is on.) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:55, 4 March 2013
Introduction
The following icons are intended as a visual aid to indicate the significance of each line in a structured debate; they work best when invoked via templates (as shown in the examples below) which also add shading to the background of the text whose status is being indicated.
Icons
key icons
Main point / claim
Supporting point
Counterpoint
Information stipulated by both sides, or from an agreed-on authority
auxiliary
It's less certain how useful these will be; possibly handy for experimentation.
quote open/close; see Template:Arg/quote
possibly statements posted by one side and agreed by the other (where the "I" debaticon indicates items agreed to beforehand)
- "X" icons, generally intended to indicate some clear error or misuse (e.g. a logical fallacy or factual error):
discovery of error supports main claim; see Template:Arg/support/fact
discovery of error weakens main claim; see Template:Arg/counter/fact
Error: early, less-clear version of red X icon
Related Pages
- the debaticons category is where we will keep all our debaticon images and templates
Examples
Stuff exists!
Indeed, surveys show that nothing could be more true!
That is an utter load of foetid dingo's kidneys!
- Even if stuff is a load of foetid dingo's kidneys, foetid dingo's kidneys do in fact exist and therefore so does stuff!
- Stuff made by Big Phatt Lyar Industries is better than the stuff made by Quality Products, Inc.
- A spokesman for Bigg Phatt Lyar Industries said: Our products are absolutely the finest quality of any products anywhere, so there is no need for people to go criticizing them. Criticism hampers quality control, which only harms the consumer.
- A company spokesman would probably say that whether or not it was true.
Rules
Points are supporting (
) if they support the current main point (
). If a point supports the current counterpoint (
), then it is also a counterpoint. If it argues against the current counterpoint, then it is a supporting point. (This way you don't have to go up through the levels counting in order to figure out which "side" a point is on.)