Difference between revisions of "Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement"

From InstaGov
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(moved two sections to subpages for easier linking)
(brigading)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
Things that credibility management ''should'' be able to defeat or at least control:
 
Things that credibility management ''should'' be able to defeat or at least control:
 +
* [[brigading]] -- though it may take a combination of credibility management and [[debate mapping]]:
 +
** '''2015-07-17''' [http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/07/17/there-are-good-reasons-ive-never-been-a-fan-of-reddit/ There are good reasons I’ve never been a fan of Reddit]
 
* [[evaporative cooling]]:
 
* [[evaporative cooling]]:
 
** '''2010-10-10''' [http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/social-software-sundays-2-the-evaporative-cooling-effect/ Social Software Sundays #2 – The Evaporative Cooling Effect]
 
** '''2010-10-10''' [http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/social-software-sundays-2-the-evaporative-cooling-effect/ Social Software Sundays #2 – The Evaporative Cooling Effect]

Revision as of 01:31, 18 July 2015

Contents

Notes

Things that credibility management should be able to defeat or at least control:

Credibility management is beginning to look potentially useful for rating subjective quality of aesthetic works. Some discussion of that application is here: