Difference between revisions of "Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement"

From InstaGov
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (tweaks)
(deleted Periscope page -- content moved to Mechanisms)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
* [[/purpose]] - this needs to be a bit more general
 
* [[/purpose]] - this needs to be a bit more general
 
* [[/mechanism]] - the quasi-technical details
 
* [[/mechanism]] - the quasi-technical details
==Related==
 
* [[/Periscope]] has implemented "safety features" which have a lot in common with this idea
 
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
Things that credibility management ''should'' be able to defeat or at least control:
 
Things that credibility management ''should'' be able to defeat or at least control:

Revision as of 13:13, 24 October 2017

About

Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement is a methodology for sharply reducing the problem of posting content in bad faith (including both outright verbal abuse as well as abuses that are harder to spot, such as sea-lioning) by allowing users to collectively delegate other trusted users to rate comments and commenters as to their credibility and appropriateness. It generally increases per-user accountability for abuse, but with the source of that accountability being other users rather than a central authority (with all the bottlenecking and power-concentration that implies).

Pages:

Notes

Things that credibility management should be able to defeat or at least control:

Credibility management is beginning to look potentially useful for rating subjective quality of aesthetic works. Some discussion of that application is here: