Difference between revisions of "Peer-to-Peer Accountability Enforcement"

From InstaGov
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(brigading)
(→‎Notes: online harassment)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
** '''2015-04-20''' [http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121551/bot-bubble-click-farms-have-inflated-social-media-currency How Click Farms Have Inflated Social Media Currency]
 
** '''2015-04-20''' [http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121551/bot-bubble-click-farms-have-inflated-social-media-currency How Click Farms Have Inflated Social Media Currency]
 
*** private discussion [https://plus.google.com/u/0/104092656004159577193/posts/MGmWGw3vUBx here]
 
*** private discussion [https://plus.google.com/u/0/104092656004159577193/posts/MGmWGw3vUBx here]
 +
* [[online harassment]]
 +
** '''2014-10-09''' [http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/10/the-unsafety-net-how-social-media-turned-against-women/381261/ The Unsafety Net: How Social Media Turned Against Women] ([https://plus.google.com/u/0/+CindyBrown/posts/8Ahnx7mVciy via])
  
 
Credibility management is beginning to look potentially useful for rating subjective quality of aesthetic works. Some discussion of that application is here:
 
Credibility management is beginning to look potentially useful for rating subjective quality of aesthetic works. Some discussion of that application is here:

Revision as of 13:51, 14 April 2016

Contents

Notes

Things that credibility management should be able to defeat or at least control:

Credibility management is beginning to look potentially useful for rating subjective quality of aesthetic works. Some discussion of that application is here: