Difference between revisions of "Liquid democracy"
(purpose; note about liquid agenda) |
m (→Purpose: wpedia link for "gaming the system") |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Existing democratic systems have systemic problems. | Existing democratic systems have systemic problems. | ||
* [[Direct democracy]] does not scale well to more than a few hundred people. There are too many issues, too much information needed (some of it quite specialized) in order to reach a good decision, too many differing understandings (or misunderstandings) of the likely effects of each decision, and too many conflicting goals. | * [[Direct democracy]] does not scale well to more than a few hundred people. There are too many issues, too much information needed (some of it quite specialized) in order to reach a good decision, too many differing understandings (or misunderstandings) of the likely effects of each decision, and too many conflicting goals. | ||
| − | * [[Representative democracy]] creates too many opportunities for [[gaming the system]] by manipulation of [[unaccountable concentrations of power]] (UCPs). | + | * [[Representative democracy]] creates too many opportunities for [[wikipedia:gaming the system|gaming the system]] by manipulation of [[unaccountable concentrations of power]] (UCPs). |
Liquid democracy is intended to address these issues by creating a system that minimizes <abbr title="unaccountable concentrations of power">UCPs</abbr> while respecting expertise and allowing delegation of decisions. | Liquid democracy is intended to address these issues by creating a system that minimizes <abbr title="unaccountable concentrations of power">UCPs</abbr> while respecting expertise and allowing delegation of decisions. | ||
| + | |||
===Definition=== | ===Definition=== | ||
[[Liquid democracy]] is a term that seems to be used in a number of different ways. | [[Liquid democracy]] is a term that seems to be used in a number of different ways. | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 28 March 2013
About
Purpose
Existing democratic systems have systemic problems.
- Direct democracy does not scale well to more than a few hundred people. There are too many issues, too much information needed (some of it quite specialized) in order to reach a good decision, too many differing understandings (or misunderstandings) of the likely effects of each decision, and too many conflicting goals.
- Representative democracy creates too many opportunities for gaming the system by manipulation of unaccountable concentrations of power (UCPs).
Liquid democracy is intended to address these issues by creating a system that minimizes UCPs while respecting expertise and allowing delegation of decisions.
Definition
Liquid democracy is a term that seems to be used in a number of different ways.
- Wikipedia says it is a synonym for "delegative democracy", in which "voting power is vested in delegates, rather than representatives."
- Make Your Laws defines it as a transferable proxy system.
InstaGov defines it as any democratic system designed to:
- give citizens control over how power is channelled
- rapidly respond to changes requested by those citizens
- not draw arbitrary boundaries, either in time or space, beyond which power may not be exercised
The combination of power-channelling control, rapid response, and lack of arbitrary boundaries – directable, changeable, and fluid – is what makes a democratic system "liquid".
Implementation
InstaGov proposes weighted proxy voting (WPV) within a liquid agenda system as the primary mechanism for liquid democracy, with other supplemental mechanisms to encourage better decisionmaking.
InstaGov also supports liquid representation as an alternative to WPV, if it has a better chance of being adopted.